These images look like charts, graphs, diagrams, screenshots, or maps based on their filename or alt text. No automated tool can measure contrast inside an image. Confirm that parts required to understand each graphic have at least a 3:1 contrast ratio against adjacent colors, and that meaning is not conveyed by color alone. Plain photographs are exempt from the contrast requirement.
What we found: braille-ready-1999.png (alt "Screenshot of the Braille Ready, Inc. website, 1999.")
Reflow at 320 CSS pixels needs a look Human review
Set the window to 320 CSS pixels wide, or zoom a 1280 pixel window to 400 percent, and look at each item listed. Content that needs a two-dimensional layout to mean anything (a data table, a map, a diagram, video, code, a toolbar) is allowed to scroll sideways; ordinary text, forms, and navigation are not. Text reported as cut off or overlapping was measured against the same page at 1280 pixels, so only damage the narrow width introduced is listed. A carousel's peeking slide is excluded by design.
What we found: The page scrolls sideways to 329px, but nothing visible was found past the edge; the width comes from main#wp--skip-link--target > div.wp-block-group > div.entry-content:nth-of-type(2) > p.wp-block-paragraph:nth-of-type(3) > code.
Keyboard and focus order (22 stops)
This is the only lane that drives the page instead of reading it: we pressed Tab and recorded where focus actually landed, until it wrapped. Roles and names come from Chrome's own accessibility tree, the same computation it hands a screen reader. A keyboard user passes 10 stops before reaching main content, and the page has a working skip link.
Nothing in this lane is a failure. The keyboard order was walked end to end and the deterministic checks came back clean.
The links list, as a screen reader user gets it 19 links, 16 distinct names
Screen reader users navigate by pulling up every link on the page at once (Insert+F7 in NVDA and JAWS), stripped of the layout that surrounds them. This is that list. Read in place a link can borrow meaning from the heading above it; read here it has only its own name.
Links
All announce as
3
bekee gibson
2
Say hello: contact page
Names appearing more than once, most repeated first. A repeated name is not automatically wrong: a "Home" link in the header and the footer is fine. It matters when the destinations differ and the name does not.
Heading outline, as announced
h1 Braille Ready, Inc., 1999.
h2 The site.
h2 What it was actually doing.
h2 What I did with Karen.
h2 The throughline.
h2 About Bekee Gibson
h2 NEWSLETTER
h3 Notes, by email.
What this looks like on the pageEvery keyboard stop, numbered in the order focus actually visits it. Red marks a stop that is itself a problem. Open full size (new tab)The same layout, showing what is announced instead of what is rendered. Hatched areas carry nothing for a screen reader user: background images, decorative graphics, and media with no text alternative. Interactive elements show the name Chrome computed; everything else is an illustrative approximation, not a finding. Open full size (new tab)
